إحجز استشارة قانونية

Achievements

Defending Over 300 Labor Lawsuits for a Leading Healthcare Company, Reducing Claims from SAR 14 Million to Less Than SAR 5 Million

In large-scale labor litigation, the challenge lies not only in the complexity of each individual case, but also in the ability to manage a substantial number of simultaneous disputes against a single entity while maintaining consistency in legal arguments and precision in handling each case.

Our legal team represented one of the Kingdom’s leading healthcare companies in more than 300 labor lawsuits, with total claims exceeding SAR 14,000,000 (14 million Saudi riyals).

Handling litigation of this scale required developing a comprehensive defense strategy based on analyzing patterns across the lawsuits, unifying the legal grounds of defense, and tailoring the approach to each case according to its specific circumstances.

We worked to manage this significant volume of litigation efficiently, ensuring that each case was presented systematically, reflecting the company’s legal position and articulating clear, consistent defense arguments before the competent judicial authorities.

Despite the extended proceedings and numerous hearings, we achieved tangible results, including:

Reducing the final financial liabilities under court judgments to less than SAR 5,000,000 (5 million Saudi riyals), compared with total claims exceeding SAR 14,000,000 (14 million Saudi riyals).

This achievement demonstrates that managing major labor disputes requires more than legal knowledge. It demands a proven ability to handle complex caseloads, maintain consistent quality of legal representation, and deliver reliable performance across numerous cases.

In litigation of this nature, the true differentiator lies in the ability to mitigate risks and achieve measurable results.

In international import operations, damage is not merely a failure in transportation; its impact extends to product safety, commercial obligations, and the continuity of supply.

Our legal team represented our client, one of the Kingdom’s leading pharmaceutical companies, in a dispute arising from the importation of a shipment of food supplements from the United States of America, with a total value of SAR 9,000,000 (9 million Saudi riyals), transported by air freight.

Upon arrival, the shipment was found to be damaged, causing it to lose its commercial value and rendering it unfit for its intended use, resulting in direct financial loss.

The case required a thorough analysis of the responsibilities of the parties involved in the transportation chain, identification of the points at which breaches occurred between the freight intermediary and the logistics service provider, and examination of the contractual obligations and regulations governing air freight operations.

Our legal team developed a comprehensive legal case establishing the occurrence of the damage and directly linking it to the breaches committed by the responsible parties. We also submitted supporting evidence demonstrating our client’s entitlement to compensation for the full value of the goods.

Through a clear and well-supported presentation of liability before the competent judicial authority, we successfully established responsibility, resulting in a judgment in favor of our client ordering the freight intermediary and logistics service provider to compensate our client for the full value of the goods, amounting to SAR 9,000,000 (9 million Saudi riyals).

This case demonstrates that disputes in the international transportation sector require a precise understanding of overlapping responsibilities and the ability to translate technical facts into compelling legal arguments that safeguard the full extent of a client’s rights.

In cases of this nature, accurately identifying the point at which the breach occurred forms the foundation upon which the outcome is determined.

Not all cases are measured by their financial value. Some involve matters of reputation, business continuity, and criminal liability.

Our client faced charges of violating the Saudi Anti-Commercial Fraud Law, one of the serious offenses that may result in substantial financial penalties, imprisonment, or both.

The competent authorities initiated criminal proceedings, and the case was referred for judicial consideration, exposing our client to significant legal risks affecting his business activities and commercial reputation.

Our legal team developed a defense strategy focused on examining the elements of the alleged offense and establishing that its legal requirements had not been satisfied, supported by legal arguments and evidence demonstrating the validity of our client’s position.

During the judicial proceedings, we presented a comprehensive account of the facts and demonstrated that the alleged violation had not been established, ultimately persuading the court that criminal liability did not arise.

As a result, the court issued a judgment acquitting our client of the charges brought against him.

This case demonstrates that handling criminal proceedings requires exceptional precision in analyzing the elements of an offense and developing a defense capable of addressing allegations that may carry serious consequences.

In cases of this nature, the objective is not merely to minimize potential losses, but to prevent them entirely.

In administrative disputes, the challenge lies not merely in contesting a decision, but in establishing its unlawfulness under the applicable laws, regulations, and procedural requirements.

Our legal team represented our client, one of the Kingdom’s leading healthcare companies, in a number of cases challenging administrative decisions issued by multiple regulatory authorities, including the Ministry of Health, the Ministry of Commerce, and the Saudi Food and Drug Authority.

These decisions concerned regulatory violations that imposed financial liabilities on the company, requiring a thorough legal analysis of their validity and compliance with applicable procedures, as well as an examination of any deficiencies in the reasoning or application of the relevant regulations.

Our legal team developed focused legal arguments challenging the statutory grounds of the alleged violations, identifying procedural irregularities in the issuance of the decisions, and presenting evidence supporting their invalidity or the absence of legal grounds for imposing them.

Through our representation before the competent judicial authorities, we achieved tangible results, including the annulment of approximately 70% of the contested violations, resulting in a total financial impact exceeding SAR 500,000 (500,000 Saudi riyals).

These cases demonstrate that effectively challenging administrative decisions requires a precise understanding of the regulatory framework and the ability to contest both the procedural and substantive legality of such decisions.

In disputes of this nature, the true differentiator lies in the ability to transform procedural details into compelling legal arguments capable of securing the annulment of an administrative decision.

In labor disputes, securing legal rights requires careful legal management throughout every stage of litigation.

Our legal team represented a client in a labor lawsuit seeking his statutory entitlements and compensation for the unlawful termination of his employment contract. From the outset, we developed a structured legal case that clearly and persuasively connected the facts with the applicable statutory provisions.

Following the litigation proceedings, the Court of Appeal issued a judgment in favor of our client, ordering the opposing party to pay SAR 668,500 (668,500 Saudi riyals).

The opposing party subsequently challenged the judgment by filing a petition for cassation and later sought reconsideration. However, all such challenges were unsuccessful, and the judgment became final.

This case demonstrates the importance of adopting a comprehensive legal strategy from the outset and maintaining effective case management throughout the proceedings until a final judgment is secured that fully protects the client’s rights.

In labor litigation, the decisive factor in achieving a final outcome may lie in the precision of the legal arguments and the ability to withstand challenges at every stage of appeal.

In construction disputes, the disagreement often concerns not the existence of a contract, but rather the proof that the contracted works have been completed and the entitlement to payment.

Our legal team represented our client, a contracting company, in a lawsuit seeking payment of outstanding amounts for works it had completed, following the opposing party’s refusal to pay and its claim that the amounts were not due.

We developed a comprehensive legal case establishing the execution and delivery of the works in accordance with the agreed terms. This involved gathering supporting evidence and documentation, systematically linking them to the actual performance of the works, and demonstrating our client’s compliance with all contractual obligations.

Despite the extended proceedings and numerous hearings, we presented the case before the court in a clear and compelling manner, establishing that the works had been completed and that the outstanding amounts were legally due.

As a result, the court issued a judgment in favor of our client, ordering the opposing party to pay an amount exceeding SAR 490,000 (490,000 Saudi riyals).

This case highlights the importance of accurate documentation of completed works and the critical role of legal drafting in transforming technical facts into persuasive legal arguments before the courts.

In construction disputes, proving that the contracted works have been performed can be the decisive factor between a claim for payment and a favorable judicial outcome.

In off-plan property sale contracts, disputes are not always limited to delays in delivery. They may also involve a buyer’s confidence in a project that has not been completed and contractual obligations that remain unfulfilled.

Our legal team represented a client in a dispute arising from an off-plan property sale agreement after the other party failed to deliver the property as agreed, despite the existence of financial obligations.

Although the case initially appeared straightforward, its legal course proved more complex, requiring a thorough examination of the contractual relationship, evidence of the other party’s failure to fulfill its obligations, and a clear connection between that failure and the resulting legal consequences of the breach of contract.

Our legal team developed a comprehensive legal case establishing the sequence of events leading to the breach and demonstrating that continuing the contract was no longer feasible due to non-performance. This supported our client’s claim for termination of the contract and recovery of all amounts paid.

Despite the extended proceedings and numerous hearings, we presented the case systematically, convincing the court that the breach had been established and that termination of the contract was justified.

As a result, the court ruled in favor of our client, ordering the termination of the contract and requiring the opposing party to refund an amount exceeding SAR 400,000 (400,000 Saudi riyals).

This case demonstrates that handling off-plan property sale agreements requires a precise understanding of their legal nature. Establishing a delay alone is insufficient; it is also essential to demonstrate its legal implications for the parties’ contractual obligations.

In disputes of this nature, the difference between losing an investment and recovering it may lie in the ability to manage the legal case effectively from the outset.